Debiprosad Chakrabortty v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Clerical-correction order in F.M.A. 1069 of 2024 (Debiprosad Chakrabortty v. State of West Bengal & Ors.): respondent no.3, the District Inspector of Schools (P.E.), was wrongly described as (S.E.) in the appeal and in paragraph 5 of the order dated 18.03.2026; error held apparent and undisputed; Office directed to correct the appeal record; order dated 18.03.2026 modified accordingly. Bench: Madhuresh Prasad, J. and Prasenjit Biswas, J. Date on header line (D/L): 30.03.2026. No statutes or precedents cited; no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
Correction of respondent no.3's description in the appeal to “the District Inspector of Schools (P.E.)”; the Office directed to effect the correction; and the order dated 18.03.2026 modified so that the words “the District Inspector of Schools (S.E.)” in its paragraph no.5 read as “the District Inspector of Schools (P.E.)”.