Dismissed¶¶7
Mita More (Nee Bhalotia) v. Chandra Prakash More
Calcutta HCFA/134/2000
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
F.A. 134 of 2000; Mita More (Nee Bhalotia) v. Chandra Prakash More; dismissal for default; non-representation of parties; appellant not interested in pursuing appeal; vacation of interim order; return of T.C.R. (trial court record) to Court below; order dated 10.02.2026; Bench of Rajasekhar Mantha, J. and Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.; no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default; interim order, if any, vacated; T.C.R., if any, to be returned to the Court below; parties and/or Registry to communicate a copy of the order to the Court below. ¶¶7