Saddam Sekh v. the State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
CRR 412 of 2024; Calcutta High Court, Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench; Jay Sengupta, J.; order dated 19 March 2026; criminal revision dismissed for default; petitioner unrepresented at hearing; no accommodation sought; State represented by Saikat Chatterjee and Chattu Roy; urgent photostat certified copies.
What did the court decide?
The revisional application CRR 412 of 2024 is dismissed for default, as no one appeared for the petitioner on the date of hearing and neither appearance nor accommodation was sought on the last occasion (18.03.2026). ¶8