complainant did not dispute that the present petitioner no.1, the sister in law resides at Bangur ,lake town and the marital house is at Burtolla Street, P.S. Posta. The Complainant specifically averred about an incident of administration of certain drugs to her by her sister in law and mother in law on June 29, 2015 in presence of her husband after which she suffered convulsions, vomiting and bleeding and on July 6, 2015 her parents took her to Dr. Kothari who averred that her conditions was deteriorated on account of wrong treatment and admission of wrong medicine. The written complaint discloses that her in laws consisted of her husband ,parents in law brother in law and his wife and her sister in law ,the present petitioner no 1 ,her grand father in law and her uncle in law ,petitioner no. 2. The complainant did not aver the name of the sister in law when both the wife of her brother-in-law and the sister of her husband is described as the sister in law. That apart it is admitted that she resided at Bangur not at Posta .The Doctor’s certificate dated July 6,2015 of Dr. Kothari as found from the case Diary is found silent about the opinion or diagnosis of the doctor as averred in the complaint. Another certificate dated March 18, 2016 shows the treatment of the patient with a history of vomiting, bleeding convulsion and pain in abdomen and advised her to be admitted when she was pregnant and the foetus was 16wks size. The certificate issued by said Doctor Kothari is dated July 28, 2017 where the said doctor narrated the facts stated to him by the victim on July 6, 2015. In the above factual back drop the learned Court while refusing the prayer of the petitioner to discharge was of the view that law does not grant any special privilege to a person who does not permanently reside in the matrimonial home of an allegedly tortured wife, in a case of involving bridal torture.
