Disposed

Surajit Maity and Others v. State of West Bengal and Anr.

Calcutta HC16 Feb 2026CRR/3656/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court recalled an order dismissing a revisional application for default due to an unsatisfactory explanation and restored the matter. Additionally, an interim order was extended until April 30, 2026 due to urgency before disposing of the application.

What did the court decide?

Recalled order dated February 16, 2026, restored matter to original file; interim order extended till April 30, 2026.

Surajit Maity and Others Vs State of West Bengal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2026)

¶1

06.03.2026 Item No.14 Ct. No. 34 nb

¶2

CRR 3656 of 2022 With

¶3

CRAN 12 of 2026

¶4

In the matter of: Surajit Maity & Ors.

¶5

...… petitioners.

¶6

Mr. Subhendu Roy Chowdhury, Mr. Souryadeep Ghosh, .…For the Petitioner. Mr. Abhra Mukherjee, Mr. Sauradeep Dutta, Mr. Arpayan Mukherjee, Mr. Himadree Ghosh,

¶7

…… for the respondents.

¶8

Mr. Debasish Roy, Ld. P.P., Mr. Saryati Dutta, Ms. Suchismita Dutta,

¶9

…… for the State.

¶10

In Re. CRAN 12 of 2026

¶11

Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.

¶12

This is an application for recalling the order dated February 16, 2026 passed by this Court whereby this revisional application was dismissed for default.

¶13

Perused the petition and the reason assigned for not appearing before this Court. Prima facie, it appears that explanation not satisfactory enough, hence considered.

¶14

Hence, the order dated February 16, 2026 is hereby recalled and this matter be restored to its original file and number.

¶15

¶16

Accordingly, interim order, if any granted earlier is also revived.

¶17

Accordingly, CRAN 12 of 2026 is disposed of.

¶18

In Re. CRAN 11 of 2026

¶19

This is an application for extension of interim order granted on October 13, 2022, subsequently extended on December 9, 2025 which was in force up to January 31, 2026.

¶20

The application has been filed within the time and prays for extension of the said interim order.

¶21

Copy of this application has been served upon the upon the opposite party.

¶22

Considering the urgency of the matter, the interim order passed by this court is further extended till April 30, 2026 or until further order whichever is earlier.

¶23

Accordingly, CRAN 11 of 2026 is disposed of.

¶24

The matter be listed in the Monthly List of April 2026 under the heading “Contested Application”.

¶25

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶26

(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)

Surajit Maity and Others v. State of West Bengal and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surajit Maity and Others v. State of West Bengal and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhudaran K G Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Tripuresh Kr. Dey Vs Tushar Kanti Jana & Anr.

M/S. Tata Capital Finance Ltd. and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Himanshu Kumar Ghosh and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Sakti Pada Das and Another Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Vivekananda Gope Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.