Petitioner sought to withdraw a revisional application; counsel stated he did not wish to proceed, and the High Court disposed of the application as not pressed and withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.06.2026 Court No.5 Item No.34 MKP
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRR 317 of 2024
Dr. Dilip Debnath Alias Dilip Kumar Debnath And Anr Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Hillol Saha Podder
……………..for the Petitioner.
Learned Advocate on record submits that he does not wish to proceed with the revisional application and prays for withdrawal of the same.
On prayer of the parties, the revisional application is disposed of as “not pressed” and thus withdrawn.
Urgent certified website copy of this Order, if applied for, be supplied expeditiously after complying with all, necessary legal formalities
(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J)
2
Dr. Dilip Debnath Alias Dilip Kumar Debnath And Anr
The State of West Bengal
Anr.
Shampa Dutt (Paul)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
