Dismissed¶11-12
Smt. Mira Rani Naskar v. Sukumar Naskar
Calcutta HCCRR/3119/1996
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal for default of a revisional application for want of prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner; no adjournment or accommodation sought at either listing (30.03.2026 and 01.04.2026); CRR 3119 of 1996 with CRAN 1 of 1998; Jay Sengupta, J.; no statute, precedent, issue on merits, or monetary amount involved.
What did the court decide?
The revisional application together with the connected application stand dismissed for default, the petitioner having been unrepresented on both 30.03.2026 and 01.04.2026 and having sought no adjournment or accommodation. ¶11-12