Dismissed¶12

MD Safikul Islam @ MD Safiqul Islam v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC17 Feb 2026CRM (NDPS)/29/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

NDPS bail dismissed at this stage; renewal of bail prayer after consideration of charges; S.27A NDPS accusation; charge-sheet filed; petitioner an Assistant Sub-Inspector of police alleging false implication on co-accused's statement, no recovery from petitioner; S.439 CrPC / S.483 BNSS; CRM (NDPS) 29 of 2026; Tirthankar Ghosh, J.; English Bazar Police Station case no. 971 of 2025 dated 12.05.2025.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is to renew his prayer for bail after the stage of consideration of charges is over. ¶11

MD Safikul Islam @ MD Safiqul Islam Vs State of West Bengal — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2026)

¶1

17.02.2026 Court No.35. D/L.192 Rakib (Rejected)

¶2

CRM (NDPS) 29 of 2026

¶3

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with English Bazar Police Station case no. 971 of 2025 dated 12.05.2025 under Sections 21(c)/28/29/27(a) of the of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

¶4

And

¶5

In the matter of : Md. Safikul Islam @ Md. Safiqul Islam.

¶6

……Petitioner.

¶7

Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee, Sr. Adv, Mr. Priyankar Ganguly Ms. Shalini Bairagi Ms. Pipasa Chakraborty ……for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Das Mr. Abhishek Verma ……for the State.

¶8

Learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent of the charges and he is Assistant SubInspector of police who has been foisted with the criminal case. It has been submitted that there has been no recovery from the petitioner and only on the statement of the co-accused the petitioner has been arrested and from an abandoned place narcotics were recovered. So far as the money with which the petitioner has been linked the same has been recovered from the father-in-law of a coaccused.

¶9

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that charge-sheet has been submitted and there are accusations under Section 27A of the NDPS Act.

¶10

¶11

Having considered the subject matter involved in the present case, I am of the view that let the petitioner renew his prayer for bail after the stage of consideration of charges is over.

¶12

At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (NDPS) 29 of 2026 is dismissed.

¶13

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶14

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶15

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

MD Safikul Islam @ MD Safiqul Islam v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD Safikul Islam @ MD Safiqul Islam v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jane Alam Molla Vs State of West Bengal

Xxxxxx Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Prasanta Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Pallab Das Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Omar Faruque Vs State of West Bengal

Ibrahim Sk @ MD Ibrahim Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.