The petitioner withdrew the bail application in an NDPS case, and the court dismissed it as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.443. Rakib
CRM (NDPS) 2003 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
And
In the matter of : Murad @ Murubbin Kazi @ Morobbin Kazi
……Petitioner. .....for the Petitioner. ……for the State.
Mr. Shashanka Sekhar Saha Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. PP Mr. Pritam Roy Mr. Aditya Tiwari
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to proceed with the bail application.
Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail emphasizing that cross-examination of the PW1 is stretched by the petitioner for one and half years.
Be that as it may, since the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal, CRM (NDPS) 2003 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed.
Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Murad @ Murubbin Kazi @ Morobbin Kazi
State
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
