Allowed¶17

Anisur Rahaman @ Mota v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC1 Jul 2026CRM (NDPS)/1250/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Calcutta High Court, Appellate Side; C.R.M (NDPS) 1250 of 2026; Anisur Rahaman @ Mota v. The State of West Bengal; bail under Section 483 BNSS 2023; NDPS Act 1985 Section 20(b); Beldanga Police Station Case No. 168 of 2014 dated 11.03.2014; 22 kg ganja; custody since 21.05.2026; charges not framed; bail granted with weekly reporting condition to O.C./I.C. Beldanga P.S.; decided 01.07.2026 by Tirthankar Ghosh, J.; order allowed.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on terms and conditions as the learned Trial Court deems fit and proper, with the additional condition that the petitioner meet the Officer-in-Charge/Inspector-in-Charge of Beldanga Police Station once a week until the condition is modified by the Trial Court. ¶17

Anisur Rahaman @ Mota Vs State of West Bengal — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

D/L 283

¶3

01.07.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 Allowed

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

¶5

C.R.M (NDPS) 1250 of 2026

¶6

Anisur Rahaman @ Mota Vs

¶7

The State of West Bengal

¶8

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Beldanga Police Station Case No. 168 of 2014 dated 11.03.2014 , under Sections 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (N.D.P.S.) Act, 1985 And

¶9

In the matter of : Anisur Rahaman @ Mota

¶10

Mr. Ali Ansan Alamgir Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon Ms. June Modak Mr. Rajen Banerjee Mr. Bankim Pal

¶11

……Petitioner. …for the Petitioner

¶12

…for the State

¶13

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that initially petitioner was granted bail but for miscommunication warrant of arrest was issued and he was subsequently taken into custody and has been in custody since 21.05.2026. Petitioner is in custody for about one and a half months. The subject matter of the case is related to alleged recovery of 22kgs of ganja.

¶14

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits petitioner has contributed the delay in the present case.

¶15

¶16

I have taken into account the said factum but the charges are yet to be framed. Accordingly I release the petitioner on bail on such terms and conditions as the learned Trial Court deems fit and proper. With an additional conditional that the petitioner if on bail will meet with the Officer-in-Charge/Inspector-in-Charge of Beldanga Police Station once in a week till the same is modified by the learned Trial Court.

¶17