Dismissed¶15

Jashimuddin Sarkar v. State of West Bengal

Bail – S.483, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – NDPS Act, Ss.21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/25/27A/29

Calcutta HC16 Feb 2026CRM (NDPS)/1169/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under S.483 BNSS 2023 rejected; C.R.M. (NDPS) 1169 of 2025; Jashimuddin Sarkar v. The State of West Bengal; Balurghat PS Case No.454/2025 dated 10.07.2025; NDPS Act Ss.21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/25/27A/29; petitioner in custody 7 months; charge-sheet filed; alleged implication on co-accused's statement; continuous communication with Nashim Rejvi and Samim Shekh; nodal agency report with compact disc; liberty to prosecution to file supplementary charge-sheet; IO's further appearance dispensed with; Tirthankar Ghosh, J.; dated 16.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Some opportunity granted to the prosecution to file a supplementary charge-sheet if it intends to; no relief to the petitioner. ¶15

Jashimuddin Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2026)

¶1

D/L192 16.02.2026

¶2

Bpg. Rejected

¶3

C.R.M. (NDPS) 1169 of 2025

¶4

In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Balurghat Police Station Case No.454 of 2025 dated 10.07.2025 under Section 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/25/27A/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985;

¶5

Jashimuddin Sarkar Versus The State of West Bengal

¶6

Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury

¶7

Mr. Dwaipayan Panda. …for the petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Bitasok Banerjee Mr. Debarshee Bramha. …for the State.

¶9

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits

¶10

that the petitioner is in custody for 7 months. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and there are no materials collected to show that there has been any recovery from the petitioner and the petitioner has been implicated on the basis of statement of coaccused.

¶11

On the other hand, learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there was continuous communication on the relevant date of incident between the present petitioner and one Nashim Rejvi and also between Nashim Rejvi and Samim Shekh.

¶12

Be that as it may, the prosecution case is against the

¶13

¶14

petitioner for carrying out clandestine business. Learned advocate for the State has submitted the report of the nodal agency enclosing the compact disc. Having regard to the fact that the case is at the initial stage where dates are being fixed for supply of copies, some opportunity is granted to the prosecution for exercising their discretion if they intend to file supplementary charge-sheet.

¶15

At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM(NDPS)1169 of 2025 is rejected.

¶16

The investigating officer of the case is present in Court. His further appearance before this Court is dispensed with.

¶17

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶18

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

¶19

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

Jashimuddin Sarkar v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jashimuddin Sarkar v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nabab Sk Vs State of West Bengal

Minajul Mondal @ Mandal Vs State of West Bengal

Subal Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal

Babar Shah @ Babar Ali Shah Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Biplab Murmu Vs State of West Bengal

Jane Alam Molla Vs State of West Bengal