Dismissed¶14
Parimal Ray@Roy v. the State of West Bengal and Anr.
Calcutta HCCRM(A)/909/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Calcutta High Court, Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri; C.R.M. (A) 909 of 2025; decided 05.01.2026 by Tirthankar Ghosh, J.; Parimal Ray @ Roy v. State; anticipatory bail rejected, application dismissed; Alipurduar Women Police Station Case No. 74 of 2025; S.4 POCSO Act, 2012; S.351(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; S.482 BNSS 2023; S.438 CrPC 1973; S.183 BNSS victim statement; four-day delay in FIR contended.
What did the court decide?
Having considered the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS and the attending circumstances, the Court held that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, and the prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected. ¶11