Dismissed¶13
Motaleb Baidya v. State of West Bengal
Calcutta HCCRM (A)/840/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
CRM(A) 840 of 2026; anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS 2023; dismissal for default; petitioner absent at hearing; non-appearance on 07.05.2026; no accommodation sought; Motaleb Baidya; Somnath Adhikary for State; Arani Bhattacharya for de facto complainant; Jay Sengupta, J.
What did the court decide?
The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for default, since no one appeared for the petitioners when the matter was called on for hearing, both on the last occasion (07.05.2026) and at the present hearing, and no accommodation was sought. ¶13