Rahil Sk. @ Rahin Sk. @ Rahil and Anr. v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail rejected. CRM (A) 772 of 2026, decided 08.04.2026, Jay Sengupta, J. Application under Section 482 BNSS 2023 arising from Raghunathganj P.S. Case No. 785 of 2025 (FIR dated 16.06.2025) under Sections 329(4), 117(2), 109(1) and 3(5) BNS 2023. Grievous injury recorded in injury report; victim and witness statements; incriminating case diary materials; 14 named accused, injuries on three victims. Petitioners: Rahil Sk. @ Rahin Sk. @ Rahil & Anr. (Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee, Ms. Suchismita Chakraborty); State represented by Mr. Kaushik Kundu and Mr. Karan Bapuli.
What did the court decide?
Given that several injuries were inflicted on the victims and considering the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, the Court did not consider this a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. ¶9