Farizar Rahaman@Farijar Rahaman v. the State of West Bengal and Anr.
Calcutta HCCRM(A)/529/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Corrigendum order correcting the spelling of the State's advocate's name in an earlier anticipatory bail order under BNSS; no substantive decision on bail was made.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
29.07.2026 Suppl No.2 Court No.11 (gc)
¶2
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
¶3
CRM (A) 529 of 2026
¶4
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
¶5
And
¶6
In the matter of : Farizar Rahaman @ Farijar Rahaman
¶7
- Petitioner.
¶8
- The name of the Advocate appearing for the State be corrected as “Ms. Baishali Chakrabarty” instead of “Ms. Baishali Chakraborty” in the order dated 27th July, 2026.
¶9
- The remaining portions of the order dated 27th July, 2026 shall remain unaltered.
¶10
- Let this order be treated as part of the original order.
¶11
- Department is directed to take necessary steps.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Farizar Rahaman @ Farijar Rahaman
Coram
AI extract
Shampa Sarkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM(A)/529/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court