Dismissed¶11
Tipu Sultan v. State of West Bengal
Calcutta HCCRM (A)/448/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail rejected; Section 482 Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita; Explosive Substance Act Sections 3/4; Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 947 of 2025; bomb blast; petitioner claimed to be only co-owner of property and absent at blast; State relied on seizure list and local witnesses; incriminating materials in case diary; I.O. presence dispensed with; Tipu Sultan; Jay Sengupta, J.; CRM (A) 448 of 2026.
What did the court decide?
Having considered the submissions of both sides together with the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, the court found that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail, and accordingly rejected the petitioner's application. ¶10