Sanjoy Mondal v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
Court No.35. D/L.22. Rakib (Allowed) CRM ( A…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
Court No.35. D/L.22. Rakib (Allowed) CRM ( A ) 3011 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Saltora Police Station case no. 84 of 2026 dated 05.06.2026 under Sections
Disposed 25 days after registration.
22.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.22. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (A) 3011 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Saltora Police Station case no. 84 of 2026 dated 05.06.2026 under Sections 341/323/325/384/387/406/408/506/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of : Sanjoy Mondal ……Petitioner. Mr. Samiran Mondal Mr. Nitish Samanta Ms. Agniva Mandal Mr. S. Mitra ......for the Petitioner. Mr. Subhendu Sinha Roy Mr. Anirban Kumar Banerjee ……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in the instant case after there was change in administration.
Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
I have taken into account the accusation which is initiated from the year 2016. Having considered the same, I am of the view that although investigation can continue but custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner namely, Sanjoy Mondal is allowed.
Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal
2
Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM (A)/3011/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court