Allowed

Bablu Barman v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC9 Jan 2026CRM(A)/18/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri allowed an application for anticipatory bail. The court noted old simple injuries and directed release upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, subject to investigation conditions.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties and complying with conditions.

Bablu Barman Vs the State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2026)

¶1

09.01.2026 Item no. 33. Court No.3. Rakib (Allowed)

¶2

In the High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

¶3

CRM (A) 18 of 2026

¶4

In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Matigara Police Station Case No. 647 of 2025 dated 10.10.2025 under Sections 308(5)/109/11B(1)/304(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶5

And

¶6

In the matter of : Bablu Barman.

¶7

……Petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Mayank Roy ……for the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Kallol Acharjee Mr. Biswarup Roy ……for the State.

¶10

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in connection with the instant case on the accusations of having inflicted grievous injury on the complainant. It has been also submitted that similarly placed accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in CRM (A) 919 of 2025.

¶11

I have taken into account the materials available in the Case Diary as well as the injury report which reflects old, simple injuries.

¶12

Having considered the locus of the present petitioner and the nature of materials appearing, I am of the view that the

¶13

¶14

petitioner is entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

¶15

As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶16

As the investigation of the case is in progress, the petitioner shall make himself available as and when called by the investigating officer till the charge-sheet is furnished before the learned jurisdictional Court.

¶17

Accordingly, CRM (A) 18 of 2026 is allowed.

¶18

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶19

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶20

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

Bablu Barman v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu Barman v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dipmala@Deepmala Rasaily@Dipmala Biswakarma and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal

Palash Deb Singha@Bachchan Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Omkar Sarkar@Onkar Sarkar Vs the State of West Bengal

Dilip Barman Vs the State of West Bengal

Bapi Alam@Nabiul Islam Vs the State of West Bengal

Saiful Haque Vs the State of West Bengal