Anticipatory bail sought under Section 482 BNSS in a Tehatta police station case under Sections 329(3)/351(1)/108 BNSS. Considering witness statements including those of the victim's minor daughter and neighbours, the court declined bail and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
62 03-02-2026 (ct. no. 28) KOLE Rejected 265700
CRM (A) 140 of 2026 In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No. 991 of 2025 dated 22.12.2025 under Sections 329(3)/351(1)/108 of the BNSS. - A n d - In the matter of : Pintu Biswas .... Petitioner. Mr. M. Hossain, … For the Petitioner. Mr. Anwar Hossain, Mr. S. Ganguly, … For the State. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the petitioner and the State. Perused the case diary. Considering the statements of witnesses, especially that of the minor daughter of the victim and the neighbours of the victim, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the accused/petitioner. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, dismissed.
( Jay Sengupta, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case under Sections 329(3)/351(1)/108 BNSS.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pintu Biswas
State
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
