Anticipatory bail application for a Kaliachak police station NDPS case was dismissed as not pressed after the petitioner had already been arrested and counsel declined to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48 03.02.2026 Court No.28. (D.Hira)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
CRM (A) 126 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 1044 of 2025 dated 15.06.2025 , under Sections 21( c)/25/27A/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
And
In the matter of: - Abdus Salam Choudhury @ Abdus Salam @ Abdus Samad @ Gonga. ..…petitioner.
Md. Wasim Akram.
… for the petitioner
Mr. Koushik Kundu, Mr. Sharequl Haque.
… for the State
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is not inclined to press the application and has already been arrested.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed.
Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Abdus Salam Choudhury @ Abdus Salam @ Abdus Samad @ Gonga
Md. Wasim Akram
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
