Dismissed¶¶4
Sri Sashi Bhusan Ash & Anr. v. Smt. Subala Ash
Default dismissal – Appellants remained unrepresented repeatedly
Calcutta HCCR/1554/1989
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Short order dated 17.03.2026 dismissing both CR 1554 of 1989 and the connected FMAT 3593 of 1988 for default, as the appellants (Sri Sashi Bhusan Ash and another) remained unrepresented repeatedly; no order as to costs; interim order, if any, vacated; coram Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Supratim Bhattacharya, JJ.; no issues framed, no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal for default of CR 1554 of 1989 and FMAT 3593 of 1988 without any order as to costs; interim order, if any, vacated. ¶¶4