Dismissed¶¶12
Provat Kr. Mukherjee v. Abul Hasnat
Contempt petition – dismissal for want of prosecution
Calcutta HCCPAN/300/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Provat Kumar Mukherjee v. Abul Hasnat, Block Land & Land Reforms Officer, Khayarasole — C.P.A.N. 300 of 2006 with F.M.A. 2119 of 2008 — contempt petition dismissed for want of prosecution; none appeared for parties; parties lost interest; matter rendered infructuous; order dated 05.05.2026; Sujoy Paul, CJ. and Partha Sarathi Sen, J.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, the Court recording that none appeared for the parties, that in this matter of 2006 the parties had lost interest, and that the matter had rendered infructuous. ¶¶12