A contempt application arising from a writ petition was rendered infructuous because the Division Bench had dismissed the underlying order of 27.03.2025; the Single Judge accordingly disposed of the contempt application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.06.2026. Subadip Sl. No. 67 Ct. No.652.
CPAN 1095 of 2025
Harish Sharma Vs. Anil Kr. Mishra & Ors In WPA 8812 of 2023
Harish Sharma Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Kalyan Kr. Chakraborty, Mr. S. Sengupta.
…..for the alleged contemnor.
Learned Advocate for the alleged contemnor Mr. Kalyan Kr. Chakraborty appears. He submits that by dint of an order dated December, 2025 of the Hon’ble Division Bench, the order of this Court under contempt, that is, dated 27.03.2025 in WPA 8812 of 2023, has been dismissed.
In view of the said order by the Hon’ble Division Bench it is found that the present contempt application has become infractuous. For the said reason, let the same be disposed of. The contempt application being CPAN 1095 of 2025 is disposed of being infractuous.
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Harish Sharma
Anil Kr. Mishra & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
