Anindya Chowdhury v. Yogendra Kumar Arya
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the petitioner stated the matter had become infructuous as the petitioner obtained the permit. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Counsel for the petitioner stated the matter had become infructuous as the petitioner obtained the permit. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02.07.2026 Ct. No. 2 D/L 14 Mujahid
CO 2717 of 2022 Anindya Chowdhury Vs. Yogendra Kumar Arya
Ms. A. Banerjee Ms. Ria Kundu
…for the petitioner
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that present matter has become infructuous as the petitioner has got the permit.
2. Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)
Anindya Chowdhury
Yogendra Kumar Arya
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court