Ananya Naru @ Mondal v. Laxmikant Naru

Calcutta HC10 Apr 2026CO/1991/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CO 1991 of 2025; Smt.Ananya Naru @ Mondal vs Laxmikant Naru; corrigendum order; correction of typographical errors; order dated 10.04.2026 modified; Additional District Judge, Barasat; North 24 Parganas; Baruipur; 'wife/petitioner' substituted for 'husband/opposite party'; order to be read along with order dated 10.04.2026; department to incorporate corrections at once; Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.; 27.04.2026; Item No.04 Court No. 30.

What did the court decide?

Typographical corrections directed to be made in the order dated 10.04.2026; the order stands modified accordingly, is to be read along with the original order dated 10.04.2026, and the department is directed to incorporate the correction/modification in the original order at once. ¶¶27

Ananya Naru @ Mondal Vs Laxmikant Naru — Calcutta HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶27

Issue for consideration

Whether the typographical errors in the order dated 10.04.2026 should be corrected, including noting 'Barasat' after 'Additional District Judge', inserting 'Additional District Judge, Barasat'/'Baruipur'/'District' at the specified places, and replacing 'husband/opposite party' with 'wife/petitioner'.

¶¶10

Court's answer

In paragraph 1 and 2 of the order dated 10.04.2026, the word 'Barasat' is to be noted after the word 'Additional District Judge'.

¶¶11

Ratio / Principle

At paragraph 2 of the order dated 10.04.2026, the words 'husband/opposite party' are to be deleted and the words 'wife/petitioner' incorporated in their place.

¶¶14

Key takeaways

In the 3rd line of paragraph 4, the words 'Additional District Judge, Barasat' are to be incorporated before the words 'North 24 Parganas'.ratio¶¶17
In the 17th line of paragraph 4, the word 'Baruipur' is to be incorporated after 'Additional District Judge'.ratio¶¶22
In the 15th line of paragraph 4, the word 'Barasat' is to be noted after the words 'Additional District Judge'.ratio¶¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Corrigendum/modification order (CO 1991 of 2025) dated 27.04.2026 passed by Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. in Smt.Ananya Naru @ Mondal v. Laxmikant Naru, correcting typographical errors in the order dated 10.04.2026: 'Barasat' noted after 'Additional District Judge' in paragraphs 1 and 2 and in the 15th line of paragraph 4; 'Additional District Judge, Barasat' incorporated before 'North 24 Parganas' in the 3rd line of paragraph 4; 'Baruipur' incorporated after 'Additional District Judge' in the 17th line of paragraph 4; 'District' incorporated after 'Additional' in paragraph 6; and at paragraph 2 the words 'husband/opposite party' deleted and 'wife/petitioner' incorporated. The order dated 10.04.2026 is modified accordingly, is to be read along with the original order, and the department is directed to incorporate the correction/modification in the original order at once.

Ananya Naru @ Mondal v. Laxmikant Naru

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ananya Naru @ Mondal v. Laxmikant Naru

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Armenian College and Philanthropic Academy and Anr. Vs Employees Provident Fund Organization and Ors.

M/S. Besco Limited (Foundry Division) Vs Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors.

Eastern Coalfields Limtied Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sudhamay Maiti and Ors. Vs Central Provident Fund Commissioner and Ors.

Dr. Senjuti Chowdhury Vs Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Pabitra Kumar Nanda and Anr. Vs Chairman - in Council, Haldia, Municipality and Ors.