Disposed¶21

Anowara Bibi and Ors. v. Mucha Sk. and Ors.

Calcutta HC9 Apr 2026CO/1186/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.O. 1186 of 2026 disposed of with requests to the trial court for expedited disposal of the Section 151 application (preferably on the next date fixed) and of the other pending applications; no prior notice directed, with petitioners obliged to serve the revisional application and this order on the opposite parties within a week; certified copy to be furnished on application. ¶21

Anowara Bibi and Ors. Vs Mucha Sk. and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶21

Issue for consideration

Whether this Court should direct the learned trial court to dispose of expeditiously the petitioners' pending application under Section 151 CPC (praying for police help for implementation of the injunction order dated February 28, 2025 in Title Suit No.53 of 2025) and the other pending interlocutory applications.

¶14

Court's answer

Having heard the petitioners' counsel and considered the material on record, the Court once again requested the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Additional Court, Diamond Harbour, South 24-Parganas to dispose of the application under Section 151 of the Code as expeditiously as possible and preferably on the next date fixed, so that the petitioners are not required to travel to this Court again seeking the same relief.

¶19

Ratio / Principle

The learned Trial Court was further requested to dispose of the other pending applications as expeditiously as the business of the learned Court would permit.

¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court at Calcutta (Om Narayan Rai, J.) disposed of C.O. 1186 of 2026 (decision date 09.4.2026). The revisional application by Anowara Bibi & Ors. sought expeditious disposal of their application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying for police help for implementation of the injunction order dated February 28, 2025 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Additional Court, Diamond Harbour, South 24-Parganas in Title Suit No.53 of 2025, and of other pending interlocutory applications. Noting that a coordinate Bench had already requested expedited hearing by its order dated August 11, 2025 in C.O. 2895 of 2025 and that the application remained pending, the Court once again requested the trial court to decide the Section 151 application preferably on the next date fixed and to dispose of the other pending applications as the Court's business permitted. No prior notice was directed; petitioners to serve copies on the opposite parties within a week.

¶1

In the High Court at Calcutta

¶2

Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side

¶3

22 09.4.2026

¶4

Sc Ct. no.6 Case No. :

¶5

C.O. 1186 OF 2026

¶6

In the matter of : Anowara Bibi & Ors.

…. Petitioners

VS.

Mucha Sk. & Ors.

…. Plaintiff/Opposite Party

¶11

For the Petitioner: Mr. Mrinal Kanti Ghosh

¶12

Mr. Bipasha Bhattacharyya.

¶13

….Advocates

¶14

This revisional application seeks expeditious disposal of an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter ‘the Code’) praying for police help for implementation of an order of injunction passed on February 28, 2025 by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1^st Additional Court, Diamond Harbour, South 24Parganas in Title Suit No.53 of 2025 as also other pending interlocutory applications.

¶15

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners invites attention of this Court to an order dated August 11, 2025 passed in C.O. 2895 of 2025, whereby a coordinate Bench of this Court had requested the learned Trial Court to take up hearing of the application under Section 151 of the Code praying for police help for implementation of the order of injunction as aforesaid on August 14, 2025, if the same was otherwise ready for hearing

¶16

¶17

and to make an endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is submitted that despite such order having been passed, the said application still remains pending.

¶18

In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, no direction for prior service of a copy of the revisional application along with a notice on the opposite parties is being made, however, the petitioners shall remain obliged to serve a copy of the revisional application along with a copy of this order upon the opposite parties within a week from date.

¶19

Having heard learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners and having considered the material on record this Court once again requests the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1^st Additional Court, Diamond Harbour, South 24-Parganas to dispose of the said application under Section 151 of the Code as expeditiously as possible and preferably on the next date fixed as to ensure that the petitioners are not required to travel to this Court again seeking the same relief of expeditious disposal of the said application.

¶20

Learned Trial Court is also requested to dispose of the other pending applications as expeditiously as the business of the learned Court would permit.

¶21

C.O. 1186 of 2026 stands disposed of.

¶22

¶23

Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously upon completion of all formalities.

¶24

(Om Narayan Rai, J.)

Anowara Bibi and Ors. v. Mucha Sk. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anowara Bibi and Ors. v. Mucha Sk. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shree Narayan Jha Vs Anita Nankani Alias Anita Dayal Das Nankani and Ors.

Minuza Khatun Sk Vs Jabed Ali and Anr.

Bhaskar Sarkar and Anr. Vs Akher Ali Gazi and Anr.

Panchu Nayek Alias Panchanan Nayak Vs Tarun Halder

Jaydeep Roy Chowdhury Vs Keya Mitra

Suparna Sen and Anr. Vs Verdant Project