Disposed¶4

Sajal Poddar v. Rita Poddar and Ors.

Calcutta HC17 Apr 2026CO/1183/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expeditious disposal direction; interim injunction application Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 CPC; rejection of plaint Order 7 Rule 11 CPC; Title Suit No. 27 of 2020; Civil Judge (Junior Division) 2nd Court Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas; Sajal Poddar v. Rita Poddar & Ors.; C.O. 1183 of 2026; disposed 17.04.2026; two-month timeline; no costs or quantum.

What did the court decide?

Revisional application disposed of with a request to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 2nd Court at Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas, to decide the two interlocutory applications as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the next date fixed, without unnecessary adjournments; petitioner to serve copies of the revisional application and this order on the opposite parties within a week. ¶4

Sajal Poddar Vs Rita Poddar and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶4

Issue for consideration

Whether the trial court should be directed to dispose of Title Suit No. 27 of 2020 and the two pending interlocutory applications (the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC and the opposite parties' application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC) expeditiously.

¶1

Court's answer

The revisional application is disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 2nd Court at Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas, to dispose of the two interlocutory applications (the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code and the opposite parties' application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code) as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of two months from the next date fixed, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶3

Ratio / Principle

Prior service of notice was dispensed with in view of the nature of the order, but the petitioner remains obliged to serve a copy of the revisional application together with a copy of this order upon the opposite parties within a week from date.

¶2

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil revision (C.O. 1183 of 2026) by plaintiff in Title Suit No. 27 of 2020 (Civil Judge, Junior Division, 2nd Court, Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas) seeking expeditious disposal of the suit and of two interlocutory applications — his own application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC and the opposite parties' application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint. Held: revisional application disposed of by requesting the trial court to decide both interlocutory applications as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the next date fixed, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party; prior notice dispensed with subject to the petitioner serving copies of the revisional application and the order on the opposite parties within a week.

Sajal Poddar v. Rita Poddar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajal Poddar v. Rita Poddar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Bharam Chandra Gupta (Shaw) @ Moloa Shaw Vs Kanai Das and Ors.

Saibal Kumar Bose @ Saibal Bose Vs Arun Kumar Chakraborty and Ors.

Khusbu Rai Vs Surenddar Roy and Ors.

Sanjoy Banerjee and Anr. Vs Reba Banerjee and Ors.

M/S. Nvent Realty Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pulin Sardar and Ors.

Devendra Singh and Anr. Vs Arjun Prasad Shaw