Disposed¶18

Kausik Ganguli and Others v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Calcutta HC2 Apr 2026CO/1069/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedited-disposal direction; receiver appointment application under Order XL Rule 1 CPC in Title Execution (Com) 02 of 2024, Commercial Court at Rajarhat, pending since 17.11.2025; petitioners Kausik Ganguli & Ors. v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited; opposite party claims suit premises vacated; court requests early disposal preferably next fixed date; liberty to seek preponement on notice; disposed of, no costs; single judge Om Narayan Rai, J.; decision dated 02.04.26.

What did the court decide?

Request issued to the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Rajarhat to dispose of the pending Order XL Rule 1 receiver application expeditiously, preferably on the next date fixed if not earlier; petitioners at liberty to apply for preponement upon notice to the opposite party. No order as to costs. ¶18

Kausik Ganguli and Others Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited — Calcutta HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the revisional application seeking expeditious disposal of the pending application for appointment of receiver under Order XL Rule 1 CPC in Title Execution (Com) 02 of 2024 before the Commercial Court at Rajarhat should be allowed.

¶10

Court's answer

The revisional application was disposed of by requesting the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Rajarhat to dispose of the application for appointment of receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code expeditiously and preferably on the next date fixed, if not earlier.

¶16

Ratio / Principle

In view of the grave urgency asserted by the petitioners, they were granted liberty to make an appropriate application before the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Rajarhat for preponement of the date for taking up the receiver application, upon notice to the opposite party; such application to be disposed of in accordance with law.

¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Order (CO. 1069 of 2026, decided 02.04.26) filed by Kausik Ganguli & Ors. against Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited sought expeditious disposal of an application for appointment of receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, pending in Title Execution (Com) 02 of 2024 before the learned Commercial Court at Rajarhat since November 17, 2025. The opposite party submitted it had already vacated the suit premises. Held: the Commercial Court was requested to dispose of the receiver application as expeditiously as possible, preferably on the next date fixed if not earlier; given asserted urgency, the petitioners were granted liberty to apply for preponement of the date upon notice to the opposite party, such application to be dealt with in accordance with law. CO. 1069 of 2026 disposed of; no order as to costs. (Om Narayan Rai, J.)

¶1

CO. 1069 of 2026

¶2

02.04.26 D/L Sl-10 Ct. 06 (Samar)

¶3

Kausik Ganguli & Ors. V.

¶4

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

¶5

Mr. Rwitendra Banerjee, Ms. Suchismita Chtterjee (Ghosh), Mr. Aurin Chakraborty, Mr. Prasun Ghosh, Ms. A Banerjee,

¶6

… for the petitioners.

¶7

Mr. Sanjib Kumar Mal, Ms. Shomrita Das,

¶8

Mr. Shomrik Das,

¶9

…. for the opposite party.

¶10

This revisional application has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of an application for

¶11

appointment of receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed in Title Execution (Com) 02 of 2024 before the learned Commercial Court at Rajarhat.

¶12

Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners’ submits that such application has been pending since November 17, 2025.

¶13

Mr. Mal, learned advocate appearing for the opposite party submits that the opposite party has already vacated the suit premises.

¶14

Having heard the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners and having considered the material on record, this revisional application is disposed of by requesting the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Rajarhat to dispose of the application for

¶15

¶16

appointment of receiver under Order XL Rule 1 of the Code as expeditiously as possible and preferably on the next date fixed if not earlier.

¶17

The petitioners submit that there is grave urgency in the matter. In such view of the matter, the petitioner shall be at liberty to make appropriate application before the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Rajarhat for preponement of the date for taking up the said application upon notice to the opposite party. Needless to mention that such application shall be disposed in accordance with law.

¶18

With the above observations, CO. 1069 of 2026 stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶19

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities

¶20

(Om Narayan Rai, J.)

Kausik Ganguli and Others v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kausik Ganguli and Others v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Piyar Ali Sekh and Ors. Vs Golon Sekh and Ors.

Raj Kumar Saraf Vs Pankaj Kedia

Basanta Das and Ors. Vs Arjun Mandal and Ors.

Bikash Dey and Anr. Vs Lakshmi Bhowmick

Uma Dey Vs Ratanlal Barman

Biman Pakhira Vs Padma Nava Chakraborty and Ors.