Disposed¶19

Sandhya Maity v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC9 Jan 2025WPLRT/128/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPLRT 128 of 2024; Sandhya Maity v. State of West Bengal & Ors.; O.A. 1475 of 2024; delay in fixing final hearing (deferred from 05.07.2024 order to 14.07.2025); Tribunal to regulate its own procedure; expeditious disposal; writ disposed with liberty to apply for preponment of hearing date; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file an application for preponment of the date of hearing of O.A. 1475 of 2024 before the learned Tribunal; no order as to costs. ¶19

Sandhya Maity Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

05 09.01.2025 Ct. No. 11 Jayanta

¶2

WPLRT 128 of 2024

¶3

Sandhya Maity vs.

¶4

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶5

Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Manna

¶6

….For the Petitioner.

¶7

Mr. S. P. Pahari

¶8

….For the Respondent Nos. 6 to 15.

¶9

Mr. T. M.Siddiqui, Ld. AGP Mr. D. Dutta Mr. S. Adak

¶10

….For the State.

¶11

By reason of a typographical error in the cause title of the order dated 12^th December, 2024, the number of the matter has been incorporated as ‘WPLRT 128 of 2006’ in place and stead of ‘WPLRT 128 of 2024’.

¶12

Office is directed to effect necessary correctioned in the said order.

¶13

Mr. Manna, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that by an order dated 5^th July, 2024, the final hearing of the original application (in short, OA) being O.A. 1475 of 2024 has been deferred and fixed about a year thereafter on 14^th July, 2025. Such delay in fixing a date for hearing is too long in a system where justice is supposed to be swift but deliberate.

¶14

¶15

Mr. Siddiqui, learned additional government pleader enters appearance on behalf of the State respondents and Mr. Pahari, learned advocate enters appearance on behalf of the private respondent nos. 6 to 15.

¶16

We have heard the learned advocates and considered the materials on record.

¶17

It is for the learned Tribunal to regulate its own procedures in respect of the cases on Board for effective disposal and to ensure that the cases are disposed of within a reasonable period of time.

¶18

Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case any early date of hearing is required to be fixed for expeditious disposal of the OA, needs to be considered by the learned Tribunal at the first instance.

¶19

In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an application for preponment of the date of hearing of the OA before the learned Tribunal.

¶20

There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

¶21

Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied as expeditiously as possible.

¶22

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee,J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty,J.)

Sandhya Maity v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandhya Maity v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surabuddin Molla Vs Sohanlal Manpuria and Ors.

Sanjay Prasad Gupta and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Raj Kumar Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ram Asheesh Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Ashok Kumar Som

Union of India and Ors. Vs Suvasis Dey