Dismissed¶10
Krishna Mukhopadhyay @ Mukherjee and Anr. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Calcutta HCWPA/9438/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
WPA 9438 of 2024, Smt. Krishna Mukhopadhyay @ Mukherjee and Anr. v. The State of West Bengal and Ors., decided 03.03.2025 by Kausik Chanda, J. Dismissed as infructuous after the petitioners' advocate submitted that the relevant building had already been demolished. Petitioners' advocates: Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Aishwarya Datta, Bidisha Chakraborty, Sadia Parveen, Anik Bhattacharya; Subhasis Bandopadhyay for the Municipality; Pinaki Ranjan Mitra for respondent no.5.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition has become infructuous because the relevant building, its subject matter, has already been demolished, and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. ¶9