Dismissed¶18

Raju Moyra v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC12 Feb 2025WPA/2294/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.A. 2294 of 2025 (decided 12.02.2025, Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) - petitioner Raju Moyra vs State of West Bengal: claim of having sold vehicle involved in cow trafficking; agreement with user of vehicle; Buddhadeb Maiti; unregistered third vehicle; repeated police notices to appear; disputed question of facts not examinable at investigation stage; veracity tested by unearthing of materials by investigating agency; no interference; writ petition dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The pleas taken up by the petitioner in the writ petition are disputed questions of facts which cannot be gone into at the stage of investigation by a court of law. ¶16

Raju Moyra Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

D/L 69 12.02.2025 Kausik ct.no.35

¶2

W.P.A. 2294 of 2025

¶3

Raju Moyra Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. H. Mustafi Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadra

¶5

…for the petitioner.

¶6

Ms. Sonal Sinha Mr. Amrit Lal Chatterjee

¶7

Affidavit of service so filed be kept with the

¶8

record.

¶9

Petitioner claims that he has sold out a vehicle which was involved in cow trafficking and he has entered agreement with the person who had been using the said vehicle.

¶10

It is further contended that there were three vehicles which were sold out, out of which two vehicles were registered in the name of one Buddhadeb Maiti, however, the other vehicle was purposely not registered by the said Buddhadeb Maiti in his own name.

¶11

Petitioner claims that there are documentary evidence in support of such contention. The vehicle which was not registered and continued to be

¶12

¶13

registered in his name has been found to be involved in cow trafficking and accordingly the police authorities are repeatedly serving notice upon him to appear.

¶14

Petitioner claims his innocence and submits that unnecessarily he has been implicated in the case by the police authorities in spite of his innocence and rendering all cooperation to the police authorities.

¶15

Petitioner states that he is suffering from serious ailments.

¶16

In view of the plea taken up by the petitioner in the writ petition are disputed question of facts, the same cannot be gone into at the stage of investigation by a court of law, as the veracity of which are to be tested on the touchstone of unearthing materials by the investigating agency.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid, I do not find any reason to interfere with the prayers advanced in the writ petition.

¶18

Accordingly WPA 2294 of 2025 is dismissed. Report so submitted be kept with the record.

¶19

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶20

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

Raju Moyra v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Moyra v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalpona Mondal Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Chitra Joarder and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Noorul Ahad Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Pintu Sk Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Bipul Kishore Biswas Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Monirul Molla Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.