Work charged employee; seasonal Belder; pension arrears; family pension; D.C.R.B. Rules, 1971; West Bengal Administrative Tribunal; O.A.39 of 2022; delay in claim; writ petition dismissed.
The court finds no infirmity in the order of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal rejecting O.A.39 of 2022. ¶16
11th March, 2025 (D/L No.13) Ct. No.4 (SKB)
W.P.S.T.22 of 2024
Smt. Shailabala Mondal Versus The State of West Bengal and others
Mr. Mukteswar Maity, Ms. Nupur Chaudhuri
….for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kr. Mukherjee, ld. AGP, Ms. Sangeeta Roy
… for the State.
Mr. Sourav Mondal, Mr. S. Pal
… for the respondent no.5.
2
pension during his lifetime, which given rise to claim to the petitioner for arrears. The petitioner is also entitled to grant of family pension after demise of the petitioner‟s husband.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, as widow of a deceased work charged employee of the State, is entitled to arrears of pension and family pension, and whether the Tribunal rightly rejected O.A.39 of 2022.medium confidence¶11
The court finds no infirmity in the order of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal rejecting O.A.39 of 2022.ratio¶16
1 provisions across 1 enactments
How this case reached the court
Dismissal of O.A.39 of 2022 by the Tribunal, having found it devoid of any merit¶11
West Bengal Administrative Tribunal · 19.05.2023
Petitioner's husband Ramkrishna Mondal served the respondent State as a work charged employee for seven years one month twenty-two days and attained superannuation on 07.04.2004¶10
Ramkrishna Mondal passed away on 30.06.2010, more than six years after superannuation¶10
In 2022 the petitioner filed O.A.39 of 2022 before the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal claiming benefit of arrears of pension and family pension¶11
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
