Dismissed¶14
Amal Kumar Mahato v. Union of India and Ors.
Calcutta HCRVW/94/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Review of writ decision; scope of review limited to error apparent on face of record or newly discovered evidence despite due diligence; attempt to reopen decision dated 20.02.2025 in W.P.C.T. 117 of 2013 rejected; Amal Kumar Mahato vs Union of India & Ors.; R.V.W. 94 of 2025; review dismissed; bench of Madhuresh Prasad and Supratim Bhattacharya, JJ.
What did the court decide?
The scope of review is limited to error or mistake apparent on the face of the record, discovery of evidence which in spite of due diligence was not within the applicant's knowledge or could not be produced by him when the writ petition was being heard, or any other sufficient reason. ¶10