The D.I. of Schools S.E. Hooghly v. Mahadeb Bhattacharya and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt application; commuted value of pension denied; pension and gratuity released with break-up; interest portion payable upon pension amount; review application by State/alleged contemnor; District Inspector of Schools (S.E.) Hooghly report dated July 11, 2025; compliance with directions of judgment dated May 9, 2024; affidavit-in-opposition within two weeks; affidavit-in-reply within one week thereafter; matter listed after three weeks; WPA 22118 of 2023; CPAN 1258 of 2024; RVW 222 of 2024; CAN 1/2024; CAN 2/2024; Mahadeb Bhattacharya; Manish Jain; School Education Deptt.; State West Bengal; Rai Chattopadhyay, J.
What did the court decide?
Interim procedural directions only: review RVW 222 of 2024 to be heard and disposed of before further progress on the contempt application; liberty to petitioner to file affidavit-in-opposition within two weeks; affidavit-in-reply, if any, by the alleged contemnor/respondent within one week thereafter; matter listed for further consideration after three weeks. No final determination on the contempt allegation.