Dismissed¶24
Ranjan Bandyopadhyay Alias Ranjan Banerjee v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Calcutta HCRVW/161/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Calcutta High Court; R.V.W. 161 of 2025; review of judgment dated May 1, 2025 in F.M.A. 510 of 2024; review not a substitute for appeal; no error apparent on face of record; re-appreciation of materials not a ground for review; review jurisdiction declined; Bank of Baroda; Ranjan Bandyopadhyay in person; dismissed without costs; July 14, 2025; Debangsu Basak, J.; Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.
What did the court decide?
Review is not a substitute for an appeal; under the garb of review the Court is not called upon to sit in appeal over the judgment and order under review, and mere re-appreciation of materials to reach a possibly different conclusion is not a ground for review. ¶21