Raghunath Banerjee v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of review application against order dated 12.02.2025 in W.P.C.T. 9 of 2025; typographical paragraph-numbering correction (paras 11-13 read as 9-11); representation dated 25.06.2020 not an objection to discharge of higher post duties in 2015; representation post-dated retirement on 30.04.2017; acceptance of promotion w.e.f. 30.10.2015 without demur upheld; no ground for review; applicant Raghunath Banerjee; respondents Union of India and others; advocates A.K. Gayen, A.A. Gayen, M. Mukhopadhay (applicant) and Suman Chattopadhyay, Amal Kumar Datta (Union of India); bench Madhuresh Prasad, J. and Supratim Bhattacharya, J.; decided 20.05.2025.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief. Typographical correction alone was directed: paragraphs 11, 12 and 13 of the order dated 12th February, 2025 to be read as 9, 10 and 11. The review application and CAN 1 of 2025 were dismissed.