Disposed¶12

Sandip Ghosh v. Akhtar Ali and Ors.

Calcutta HC3 Apr 2025MAT/170/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

M.A.T. 170-174 of 2025 disposed of by two-member bench (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.; Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) on 03.04.2025 as having lived out their purpose/become infructuous in view of earlier orders in the appeals; maintainability of Letters Patent Appeals from Single Bench orders expressly left open; CBI report and certified copy of Single Bench order placed on record; Trial Court directed/requested to expedite trials and pending applications; parties include CBI (Rajdeep Majumder, Sr. Adv./DSG; Amajit De, Spl. P.P.; Moyukh Mukherjee) and respondent nos. 8 and 9 in MAT 172 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

All five appeals (M.A.T. 170-174 of 2025) and all pending applications disposed of; CBI report and certified copy of the Single Bench order kept on record; Trial Court requested to expedite conclusion of trials and pending applications.

Sandip Ghosh Vs Akhtar Ali and Ors. — Calcutta HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

03.04.2025 Court No.13 Item No. 3,5-8 pk

¶2

M.A.T. 170 of 2025

¶3

IA No: CAN 1 of 2025, CAN 2 of 2025 With M.A.T. 171 of 2025 IA No: CAN 1 of 2025, CAN 2 of 2025 With M.A.T. 172 of 2025 IA No: CAN 1 of 2025, CAN 2 of 2025 With M.A.T. 173 of 2025 IA No: CAN 1 of 2025, CAN 2 of 2025 With M.A.T. 174 of 2025 IA No: CAN 1 of 2025, CAN 2 of 2025

¶4

Mr. Kumarjyoti Tewari, Mr. Tarunjyoti Tewari, Mr. A. Tewari, Ms. S. Nayak, Mr. Dipankar Bhakta … for the writ petitioners/respondents.

¶5

Mr. Ayan Bhattacharyya, Mr. Z. Rauf, Mr. S. Chakraborty, Ms. P. Dev, Mr. Snehasish Dey … for the appellants in MAT 170 of 2025 and MAT 171 of 2025.

¶6

Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra, Ms. Sananda Bhattacharjee, Mr. Debendra Nath Saha … for the appellant in MAT 172 of 2025. Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nahid Ahmed, Mr. Abha Jena … for the appellants in MAT 173 of 2025 and MAT 174 of 2025.

¶7

Mr. Rajdeep Majumder, Sr. Adv.,DSG of India Mr. Amajit De, Spl. P.P. Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee … for the CBI Mr. Indrajit Adhikari, Mrs. Ritu Das … for the respondent nos. 8 and 9 in MAT 172 of 2025.

¶8

¶9

It is submitted that in view of the orders already passed in the instant appeals, the appeals themselves may have lived out their purpose or may have become infructuous.

¶10

The report of the CBI filed today is kept with the record.

¶11

The issue as regards whether the Letters Patent Appeals would lie from the orders passed by the Single Bench, has now become academic. The issue is left open to be agitated in independent and other proceedings, pending or otherwise.

¶12