Iisco Steel Plant Burnpur v. Payel Enterprises and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
FMAT 382 of 2024 (CAN 1 of 2024), decided 25.03.2025; IISCO Steel Plant Burnpur v. Payel Enterprises and another; appeal against dismissal of temporary injunction application dismissed under Order XLI Rule 11 CPC; benami transactions and registered deeds of release by employee-benamdars held toothless after prior transfers by original purchasers Prodyot and Kamal to defendants; defendants' prima facie title and possession over entire suit property accepted; plaint reliefs (b) mandatory injunction/vacant possession and (c) permanent injunction held mutually exclusive and contradictory, precluding injunction; no illegality found in trial court order; no costs; observations prima facie only; Bench: Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Uday Kumar, JJ.
What did the court decide?
This Court found no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order dismissing the plaintiff/appellant's temporary injunction application.