The Superintendent of Police, Coochbehar v. Smt. Rinku Dutta (Mallick) and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of appeal FAT/1/2021 (with CAN/1/2021 and CAN/2/2021) for default — appellant failed to correct defects despite co-ordinate Bench order dated 08.01.2024 warning dismissal; Registry report of non-correction; interim orders vacated; no order as to costs. Court: Calcutta High Court, Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; decided 21.05.2025; Bench: Rajasekhar Mantha, J. and Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.; parties: The Superintendent of Police, Coochbehar (appellant) v. Smt. Rinku Dutta (Mallick) and Anr. (respondents); no statutes or precedents cited; no counsel named.
What did the court decide?
Since the defects were not corrected by the appellant despite the co-ordinate Bench's order dated January 8, 2024, FAT/1/2021 along with CAN/1/2021 and CAN/2/2021 stand dismissed, and any interim order stands vacated. ¶9