Dismissed¶6-7
Bimal Kumar Biswas v. Chinmoyee Biswas
Calcutta HCFAT/18/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Order dated 16.12.2022 dismissing appeal FAT 18 of 2017 (Bimal Kumar Biswas v. Chinmoyee Biswas) for default: no counsel appeared for the appellant and, despite repeated directions, the appellant did not take steps to put in the requisites. Bench comprised Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J. and Tapabrata Chakraborty, J. No statute or precedent is cited in the text.
What did the court decide?
The appeal, being FAT 18 of 2017, is dismissed for default, in view of the appellant's failure despite repeated directions to take the necessary steps to put in the requisites and the absence of any appearance on behalf of the appellant. ¶6-7