Sekh Kutubuddin v. Panchanan Das
Case brief
What is this about?
Withdrawal of appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as not pressed; wrong remedy chosen - appeal instead of revisional application or application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against a non-appealable order; liberty to file appropriate challenge; merits expressly not gone into; certified copy of impugned order to be returned on furnishing photocopy; no order as to costs; FAT 10 of 2025; IA No: CAN 1 of 2025; Sekh Kutubuddin v. Panchanan Das; decision dated 14.05.2025; Bench: Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J. and Uday Kumar, J.
What did the court decide?
Appeal FAT 10 of 2025 dismissed as not pressed upon allowing withdrawal application CAN 1 of 2025; liberty granted to the appellant to prefer an appropriate challenge against the impugned order; leave granted to the learned Advocate-on-record for the appellant to take back the certified copy of the impugned order upon furnishing a photocopy for the records; no order as to costs.