First appeal judgment of March 13, 2025 contained transcription errors in the decree clauses. The court corrected numerical and typographical errors in the decree, directing that the corrections stand incorporated in the judgment and the decree be drawn up accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26th March, 2025 (AK) 01
F.A. 16 of 2012
Deeplok Financial Services Limited
Vs. The Tata Iron & Steel Company and others
Ms. Somali Mukhopadhyay
...for the appellant.
Mr. Asis Kumar Laha
...for the respondent no.6.
2
the number of the title suit, the following phrase shall be incorporated: “in the name of the Plaintiff/Appellant”.
“166777551”.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
(Uday Kumar, J.)
Deeplok Financial Services Limited
The Tata Iron & Steel Company
Respondent no.6
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Uday Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
