Rinki Chakraborty Nee Das v. State of West Bengal and Anr.
Criminal revision – restoration of de-listed revisional application – counsel's inadvertent absence when the case was called on – explanation held satisfactory
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dated 12.08.2025 by Bibhas Ranjan De, J. in CRR 788 of 2024 (with CRAN 6 of 2025 and CRAN 7 of 2025), petitioner Rinki Chakraborty nee Das. Restoration of the criminal revision was allowed upon finding the petitioner's counsel's explanation (inadvertently missing the list) satisfactory, and the previously existing interim order was revived and extended till the last week of November, 2025 or until further order, whichever is earlier. Both interlocutory applications were disposed of; the main revision was listed one week after the ensuing puja vacation, 2025. No statute or precedent was cited; no impugned order is described in this short interlocutory order.
What did the court decide?
Restoration of CRR 788 of 2024 to its original file and number (CRAN 7 of 2025 disposed of); revival and extension of the interim order till the last week of November, 2025 or until further order, whichever is earlier (CRAN 6 of 2025 disposed of); the main revision to appear one week after the ensuing puja vacation, 2025.