Partly allowed¶18

Miaraj Mandal and Anr. v. Union of India

Calcutta HC21 Mar 2025CRM (NDPS)/270/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: relaxation of bail conditions; NDPS; CRM (NDPS) 270 of 2025; CRAN 1 of 2025; Barasat Police Station reporting condition; twice in a week reduced to once in a fortnight; territorial bail restriction retained unaltered; NCB report dated 15.7.2025; objection on ground of habitual offender and likelihood of abscondance; modification of bail order dated 21.03.2025; Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.; order dated 16.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Partial relaxation of bail conditions: reporting frequency at Barasat Police Station reduced from twice in a week to once in a fortnight until further order; the remainder of the bail order dated 21st March, 2025 left unaltered. CRAN 1 of 2025 disposed of accordingly. ¶18

Miaraj Mandal and Anr. Vs Union of India — Calcutta HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

16.07.2025 18 SB

¶2

CRM (NDPS) 270 of 2025 With

¶3

CRAN 1 of 2025

¶4

In Re:- An application for Relaxation of conditions of bail

¶5

In the matter of : Miaraj Mandal & Anr.

¶6

…. Petitioners

¶7

Mr. Debasish Kar Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadra …for the Petitioners Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, Ld. DSGI Mr. Sagar Saha ...for the NCB

¶8

Re: CRAN 1 of 2025

¶9

The report submitted by the NCB, is taken on record.

¶10

This is an application wherein the petitioners have prayed for relaxation of condition of bail imposed by this court vide order dated 21^st March, 2025. By the said order, this court while granting bail to the petitioners, directed them to remain within the jurisdiction of Barasat Police Station and shall report to the O.C/I.C. of the concerned police station twice in a week until further order.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that they have complied the said order and now it has become harsh for them to attend the Barasat police station twice in a week and also to remain within the jurisdiction of Barasat police station.

¶12

Learned counsel for the NCB places the report dated 15.7.2025 and submits that if they are allowed to stay outside the jurisdiction of Barasat police station, there is every

¶13

¶14

likelihood of their abscondance and they are habitual offender and as such, there is every likelihood of committing the similar type of offence by the petitioners and accordingly, he opposed the prayer for relaxation.

¶15

Having heard learned counsel for both the parties, let the bail order passed by this court vide order dated 21^st March, 2025 is hereby modified as follows:-

¶16

“ the Petitioners shall report to the O.C/I.C, Barasat Police Station once in a fortnight in place of twice in a week until further order”.

¶17

The order dated 21^st March, 2025 is modified to that extent only. Other portions of the order shall remain unaltered.

¶18

CRAN 1 of 2025 is accordingly disposed of.

¶19

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

¶20

(Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Miaraj Mandal and Anr. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Miaraj Mandal and Anr. v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mithu @ Mithun Sen Vs New India Assurance Company Limited and Anr.

Raj Kumar Gupta Vs Union of India (Ncb)

Bhaskar Chakraborty Vs Palash Majhi & Anr.

Sreyan Mitra @ Sreyon Mitra and Another Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Pratul Maitra @ Pratul Kumar Maitra Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Atanu Pramanik and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.