Ruhul Sk @ Rahul Sk v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
no. 644 [G.S.D] CRM (NDPS) 135 of 2025 With…
no. 644 [G.S.D] CRM (NDPS) 135 of 2025 With…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.04.2026
Serial no. 644 [G.S.D]
CRM (NDPS) 135 of 2025 With
CRAN 1 of 2026
In the matter of : Ruhul Sk @ Rahul Sk
Mr. Md. Golam Nure Imrohi Mr. Partha Pratim Sinha Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury
… Petitioner(s) … for the Petitioner(s) … for the State
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted bail on 21.2.2025. There were other conditions: one of the conditions is meeting with the Inspector-incharge of Domkal police station once in a fortnight is creating hardship.
State has submitted a report which reflects that the petitioner is adhering to the conditions.
As such, I direct that the earlier conditions imposed for meeting with the Inspector-in-charge of Domkal police station is modified to the extent that instead of once in a fortnight, the petitioner shall attend the concerned Inspector-in-charge once in a month till further orders of this court. The other conditions would remain unaltered.
Accordingly, CRAN 1 of 2026 is disposed of.
Report submitted be kept with the record.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
2
Ruhul Sk @ Rahul Sk
State
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court