Dismissed¶12

Nur Islam Miya@Nur Islam v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC21 Nov 2025CRM(A)/617/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

anticipatory bail rejected; Section 482 BNSS 2023; Sections 302/34 IPC murder; Dinhata P.S. Case No. 343 of 2023; GR Case No. 382 of 2023; Sections 164 and 161 CrPC witness statements; sharp cutting weapon; post mortem ante mortem injuries; nature and gravity of offence; charge sheet filed; parity argument CRM(A) 162 of 2024; Nur Islam Miya; Nur Alam Hoque; High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench Jalpaiguri; C.R.M. (A) 617 of 2025; Bivas Pattanayak; 21.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail is refused to the petitioner: considering the case-diary materials and the nature and gravity of the offence, the Judge is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. ¶10

Nur Islam Miya@Nur Islam Vs the State of West… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

¶2

21.11.2025 Item No. 05 (DL) AN

¶3

(REJECTED) C.R.M. (A) 617 of 2025

¶4

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dinhata P.S. Case No. 343 of 2023 dated 06.07.2023 under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to GR Case No. 382 of 2023 pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dinhata.

¶5

In the matter of : Nur Islam Miya @ Nur Islam … Petitioner. Mr. Sudip Guha Mr. Ananda Paul Ms. Ankita Nag …for the Petitioner.

¶6

Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, ld. APP Mr. Aniruddha Biswas …for the State. 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the brother of the deceased. Over long standing family disputes, on the date of incident, an assault took place, in which the victim sustained injuries and died. There are no specific allegations against the petitioner. The other brother viz. Nur Alam Hoque @ Nur Alam Miya has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in CRM(A) 162 of 2024 on 11^th March, 2024. On completion of investigation, charge sheet has been submitted. This petitioner stands on the same footing. He seeks for grant of anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶7

¶8

On the contrary, opposing such prayer for anticipatory bail, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State submits that this petitioner is named by the witnesses in the statement recorded under Sections 164 and 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be the principal assailant. He seeks for dismissal of the application for anticipatory bail.

¶9

Perused the case diary and the materials on record.

¶10

In the statement recorded under Sections 164 and 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, there are specific allegations against this petitioner of assaulting the victim on the date of incident by a sharp cutting weapon. As per the post mortem report, the death was due to effect of injuries sustained therein which is ante mortem in nature. Considering the aforesaid materials and the nature and gravity of offence, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

¶11

Thus, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

¶12

The application being CRM(A) 617 of 2025 stands dismissed.

¶13

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)

¶14

Nur Islam Miya@Nur Islam v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nur Islam Miya@Nur Islam v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abiya Bibi Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Salman Ansari Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Binidini Barman and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal

Ratan Barman@Bikram Barman@Chhotu Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Amlyanjyoti Barman and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal

Ujjal Chaki and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal