Allowed¶15

Amal Roy v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC3 Apr 2025CRM(A)/193/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Calcutta High Court, Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench; C.R.M. (A) 193 of 2025 with CRAN No. 1 of 2025; Amal Roy; anticipatory bail; Section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; correction of inadvertent error in order dated July 04, 2025; bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount; local surety condition; unable to obtain regular bail; Suvra Ghosh, J.; order dated 11.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Correction of the inadvertent error in the order dated July 04, 2025; department directed to incorporate the necessary correction; correction order to be treated as part of the order dated July 04, 2025 ¶15

Amal Roy Vs the State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether the inadvertent error in the order dated July 04, 2025 should be corrected in the terms set out in the correction order

¶9

Court's answer

The first paragraph of the order is corrected to read that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this Court on April 03, 2025 on condition to furnish bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The second paragraph of the order is corrected to read that learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been able to furnish local surety and is unable to obtain regular bail

¶14

Key takeaways

The department is directed to incorporate the necessary correctionratio¶15
The correction order is to be treated as part of the order dated July 04, 2025ratio¶16
The remaining portion of the order shall remain unalteredratio¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Correction of inadvertent error (Calcutta High Court, Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri, Suvra Ghosh, J., 11.07.2025) in C.R.M. (A) 193 of 2025 with CRAN No. 1 of 2025, an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: the Court corrected two paragraphs of its order dated July 04, 2025 to record (i) that petitioner Amal Roy had been granted anticipatory bail on April 03, 2025 on a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, and (ii) the submission of learned counsel that the petitioner had not been able to furnish a local surety and was unable to obtain regular bail. The department was directed to incorporate the necessary correction; the correction order is to be treated as part of the order dated July 04, 2025, the remaining portion of that order remaining unaltered.

Amal Roy v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amal Roy v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abu Bakkar Mallik @ Asraful Vs State of West Bengal

Sk Raju Vs State of West Bengal

Abhijit Bagdi @ Avijit Bagdi Vs State of West Bengal

Biplab Barman @ Hemanta Barman Vs the State of West Bengal

Emrul Kayes @ Taitan Vs the State of West Bengal

Gobinda Chakraborty @ Maharaj Gobinda Ballav Shastri @ Govinda Chakarwarti Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.