Dismissed¶¶13
Atikur Jaman @ Atikuj Jaman @ Atik v. the State of West Bengal and Anr.
Calcutta HCCRM(M)/161/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Calcutta High Court, Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri (Kausik Chanda, J.), 12 August 2025; CRM (M) 161 of 2025; bail under Section 483 BNSS refused; offences under Sections 137(2)/140(3)/49 B.N.S. and Section 6 POCSO Act, 2012; Kotwali Police Station Case No. 808 of 2024, Cooch Behar; petitioner main accused per Section 164 CrPC statement of victim; approximately 370 days in custody; delay in trial considered; expeditious trial directed; bail application rejected.
What did the court decide?
The statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 indicates the involvement of the petitioner as the main accused. ¶¶8