Contempt rule issued in 2011 for alleged violation of an order in FMA 834 of 2010, with no steps taken since 2013. The court discharged the contempt rule as no useful purpose would be served by keeping it pending, and dismissed connected applications for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.05.2025 Item No.135 Monthly List Ct. No.26 CHC
CRC 34 of 2011 Paresh Chandra Mandal Vs.
Mr. Purna Chandra Jana & Ors. in FMA 834 of 2010 IA NO: CAN/4/2017 (Old NO:CAN/11635/2017)
dismissed for default.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
Paresh Chandra Mandal
Purna Chandra Jana
Debangsu Basak
Md. Shabbar Rashidi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
