Dismissed¶¶10
Chinmay Das v. Dr P Ulaganathan Dist Magistrate South 24 Parganas and Anr.
Calcutta HCCPAN/912/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt petition application (CPAN 912 of 2024, in WPA 6594 of 2023), Chinmay Das v. Dr. P. Ulaganathan & Anr.; service of notice on alleged contemnor dispensed with; applicant repeatedly absent (13.8.2025, 12.11.2025 and day of order); dismissed for default; order dated 17.12.2025; judge: Jay Sengupta, J.; counsel for alleged contemnor: Nilotpal Chatterjee.
What did the court decide?
The requirement of service of notice of the application upon the alleged contemnor is dispensed with, notice having remained unserved because counsel had no address for the absent applicant. ¶¶8